The film on Ex
combatants in Seria Leone reveals a lot about the socio-Economic and political
life of ex soldiers in post conflict situations. It also raises many questions.
The documentary reveals issues and challenges which these ex soldiers encounter
and it also reveals the failures of the state itself.
In the documentary
it is evident that the state has failed and continues to fail ex combatants and
the society at large. Ex combatants are left alone without any attempts to
reintegrate them into society and into the labor market through training and
provision of skills which will enable them to embark on a new life after the
conflict. The most striking thing is that these men have to navigate their own
way and then one question arises. What is to stop these men from bearing arms
again since the state largely ignores their reintegration? What is to stop
these men from being further radicalized because of their marginalization from
society? Since the state hasn’t done anything to promote trust among the ex combatants and society, what will stop the
resurfacing of old conflicts. Not only at the state level but on the level of
society in general there seems to be no social initiatives at reintegration of
ex combatants. The abandonment of ex combatants reveals why most of them turn
to crime and in some circumstances are keen to take up arms again.
The socio Economic
conditions in which these men find themselves after the war also gives less or
no prospects of a better future. Life seems, according to the documentary, to
be tough in the capital. These tough socio economic conditions are fertile
ground for conflict. They broadly resemble the failure of the state to address
issues which are the underlying cause of conflict in Sub Saharan Africa such as
unemployment. In the documentary it was also heard that the ex combatants and
Society at large distrust the government and politicians and rightly so. In such conditions of mistrust and economic
hardship it becomes easier to understand why African youth are easily
radicalized and conscripted into armed groups and conflicts . What
other alternatives are there?
The shortcomings
of the peace building-mechanisms are
also apparent in the documentary. Yes the war is over, yes Peace was agreed to, yes arms were surrendered but
there are no strong efforts to address the underlying cause of conflict and
promote social cohesion. Peace building
should not end with the signing of peace accords and proclamation of cease
fires. Social programs should follow up to buttress peace. These shortcomings
reveal why the threat of these civil conflict still looms in SSA.
The humane side of
the ex combatants is also revealed in the documentary. They state their desire
for a better life, for jobs, for an education, for love, for family and for
success. Therefore instead of branding these people as criminals and barbarians
it’s important to know and recognize them as individuals who need help and who
need to be reintegrated with society. Stigmatizing them further will not help
and it’ salsa imperative to know and recognize the abuses they faced as child
soldiers. Issues such as ethnicity and religion were barely brought up in the
documentary. Does it mean that they are of no importance in Sierra Leone?
No comments:
Post a Comment